Skip to content

TINYDOC-3593: Correct the AI license key environment variable spelling and flag the license key placeholder. - #4344

Open
kemister85 wants to merge 1 commit into
tinymce/8from
hotfix/8/TINYDOC-3593
Open

TINYDOC-3593: Correct the AI license key environment variable spelling and flag the license key placeholder.#4344
kemister85 wants to merge 1 commit into
tinymce/8from
hotfix/8/TINYDOC-3593

Conversation

@kemister85

@kemister85 kemister85 commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ticket: TINYDOC-3593

Site: Staging branch

Changes:

modules/ROOT/pages/tinymceai-on-premises-getting-started.adoc

  • Renamed all five occurrences of the .env alias AI_LICENCE_KEY to AI_LICENSE_KEY for consistent US English spelling, across the .env example, the [IMPORTANT] admonition, the prose describing the environment variable mapping, the docker run block, and the [WARNING] admonition. The placeholder value on the same line was also normalized (paste-ai-licence-key-here to paste-ai-license-key-here).
  • Left LICENSE_KEY (the container's own environment variable) and license_key (the tinymce.init() option) unchanged, as both are fixed API surface. The [IMPORTANT] admonition explaining that these are separate, non-interchangeable credentials is unchanged apart from the renamed alias.
  • Added a NOTE admonition after the token-server.js listing instructing the reader to replace 'your-license-key' with the editor license key, distinguishing it from the AI service license key and linking to the License key page. The listing itself is unmodified.
  • Corrected the anchor on two cross-references to the Credentials section of the on-premises overview page. Both pointed at #_credentials, which does not exist on that page; the correct anchor is #credentials. One of these was pre-existing and produced a broken link.

Pre-checks:

  • Branch is correctly prefixed.
  • Build passes without console errors, warnings, or issues.

Review:

  • Documentation Team Lead has reviewed.

@kemister85
kemister85 requested review from a team, MitchC1999, kimwoodfield, ltrouton and tiny-ben-tran and removed request for a team September 7, 2026 03:04
@kemister85
kemister85 marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2026 03:05
@kemister85
kemister85 requested review from a team and soritaheng as code owners September 7, 2026 03:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants