Skip to content

Done with DP-1#2011

Open
RitikaC1 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
RitikaC1:master
Open

Done with DP-1#2011
RitikaC1 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
RitikaC1:master

Conversation

@RitikaC1

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The Coin Change (problem-1.py)

Strengths:

  1. Clean, well-commented code with clear documentation of time/space complexity
  2. Efficient 1D DP solution that avoids unnecessary space usage
  3. Good variable naming (matrix for DP table)
  4. Proper handling of edge cases (amount=0 returns 0, unreachable amounts return -1)
  5. The commented first approach shows understanding of 2D DP as well

Areas for Improvement:

  1. The variable name matrix is misleading for a 1D array - consider dp or minCoins
  2. The solution could benefit from early termination if amount is 0 (though it handles it correctly)
  3. Consider adding a check for empty coins list (though constraints guarantee at least 1 coin)
  4. The commented-out 2D approach has a minor issue: matrix[0][i]=float('inf') should be float('inf') for all amounts except 0, but the current implementation is fine for the working approach

Time Complexity: O(N*M) where N is number of coins and M is amount - this is optimal for this problem
Space Complexity: O(M) - optimal compared to reference solution's O(m+n) stack space

VERDICT: PASS


House Robber (problem-2.py)

Strengths:

  1. Excellent time complexity of O(N) - significantly better than the reference solution's O(2^N) exponential time
  2. Optimal space complexity of O(1) - only two variables are used regardless of input size
  3. Clean, readable code with appropriate variable names
  4. Handles edge cases (n == 1) appropriately
  5. Good use of temporary variable to swap values correctly

Areas for Improvement:

  1. The solution could benefit from more detailed comments explaining the DP logic
  2. Consider adding handling for empty arrays (though constraints say length >= 1)
  3. The variable name "robbings" in the reference solution is misspelled - your naming is better

Comparison to Reference:

  • Your solution is far more efficient: O(N) vs O(2^N) time complexity
  • Your solution uses O(1) space vs O(N) space from the reference's recursion stack
  • The reference solution uses naive recursion while your solution uses optimized DP

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants