Skip to content

Implement Coin change And House Robber#2007

Open
ayushcha2701 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
ayushcha2701:ayush
Open

Implement Coin change And House Robber#2007
ayushcha2701 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
ayushcha2701:ayush

Conversation

@ayushcha2701

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The Coin Change (CoinChange.java)

Strengths:

  • Excellent use of dynamic programming, which is the optimal approach for this problem
  • Clear comments explaining the DP transition logic
  • Correct handling of edge cases (amount = 0 returns 0, impossible amounts return -1)
  • Good time complexity analysis in comments
  • Clean, readable code structure

Areas for Improvement:

  • The outer loop for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++) could be simplified to an enhanced for-loop since the coin value isn't directly used as a loop counter
  • Consider adding a check for amount == 0 at the beginning for early return (though the current solution handles it correctly)
  • The variable name n for coins.length is slightly confusing since n typically represents the amount in coin change problems

Minor Note:
The reference solution uses recursion with exponential complexity, while your DP solution achieves polynomial time - this is a significant improvement and shows good understanding of algorithmic optimization.

VERDICT: PASS


House Robber (HouseRobber.java)

Strengths:

  • Good approach using space-optimized dynamic programming
  • Clean variable naming and reasonable structure
  • Attempted to handle edge cases (n == 1)

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Fix the base case for n == 2: curr should be Math.max(prev, nums[1]), not Math.min
  2. Fix the prev update inside the loop: change prev = curr; to prev = temp;
  3. Consider adding comments to explain the DP logic for clarity
  4. The initialization logic needs to handle all edge cases properly

The core DP recurrence is correct: dp[i] = max(dp[i-1], dp[i-2] + nums[i]), but the implementation has bugs in tracking the previous values.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants