Skip to content

Update dependency tomasvotruba/type-coverage to ^2.3.4 (12.5) - #6910

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
12.5from
renovate/12.5-tomasvotruba-type-coverage-2.x
Open

Update dependency tomasvotruba/type-coverage to ^2.3.4 (12.5)#6910
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
12.5from
renovate/12.5-tomasvotruba-type-coverage-2.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
tomasvotruba/type-coverage ^2.3.0^2.3.4 age confidence

Release Notes

TomasVotruba/type-coverage (tomasvotruba/type-coverage)

v2.3.4

Compare Source

v2.3.3

Compare Source

v2.3.2

Compare Source

v2.3.1

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Berlin)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.03%. Comparing base (bde2609) to head (289b3b4).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               12.5    #6910   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     96.03%   96.03%           
  Complexity     7576     7576           
=========================================
  Files           798      798           
  Lines         23233    23233           
=========================================
  Hits          22312    22312           
  Misses          921      921           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants