Audit website claims against current runtime support

[simple-agent-manager]

Summary

@raphaeltm weekly website claims audit for apps/www/. I checked the landing page components, docs overview/concepts pages, roadmap page, and the implementation sources that define agents, cloud providers, runtimes, orchestration, deployments, notifications, and collaboration.

Area checked	Code/source checked	Result	Change
Supported agents	packages/shared/src/agents.ts, packages/shared/src/agent-install-manifest.json, harness capabilities	Six public agents still match code: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, Mistral Vibe, OpenCode, Amp.	None
Supported providers	apps/api/src/schemas/credentials.ts, apps/api/src/schemas/workspaces.ts, provider-related API/UI references	Public provider list still matches code: Hetzner, Scaleway, Vultr, Infomaniak, DigitalOcean, UpCloud, GCP.	None
Runtime/user journey claims	apps/api/src/db/schema.ts, apps/web/src/components/agent-profiles/ProfileFormDialog.tsx, docs concepts runtime section	Homepage copy still implied every chat required cloud VM/devcontainer. Code supports Instant cf-container profiles and hosted/platform compute paths.	Updated Hero, Features, How It Works, and Comparison copy to describe Instant containers or cloud VMs.
Feature descriptions	Routes/services/components for chat, notifications, forking, triggers, runtime config, app deployments	Described capabilities remain implemented.	None
Comparison table	Same agent/provider/runtime sources	Provider/agent rows were accurate except runtime row needed Instant path included.	Updated SAM “Your code runs on” cell.
Roadmap status	apps/api/src/db/schema.ts, deployment services/routes/UI, project membership schema/UI, CLI package, trigger schemas	Complete/Planned statuses reviewed; no shipped major item found incorrectly left as Planned besides no AWS support still planned.	None
Docs overview/concepts/roadmap	apps/www/src/content/docs/docs/overview.mdx, concepts.mdx, reference/roadmap.md	Docs already describe Instant vs VM and hosted compute accurately.	None

Verification

• pnpm --filter @simple-agent-manager/www build

Notes

• No blog posts were changed.
• No structural layout/navigation changes were made.
• Pre-existing local .codex/config.toml modification was not committed.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 6 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing sam/weekly-website-claims-audit-9r8nzc (4b04b14) with main (35c5732)}

[raphaeltm]

@coderabbitai please help me understand: why didn't you automatically review this pr?

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="raphaeltm/simple-agent-manager"
pr_number="1846"

echo '=== PR metadata ==='
gh pr view "$pr_number" --repo "$repo" \
  --json number,state,isDraft,createdAt,updatedAt,author,baseRefName,headRefName,labels,reviewRequests,statusCheckRollup \
  --jq '{number,state,isDraft,createdAt,updatedAt,author:.author.login,baseRefName,headRefName,labels:[.labels[].name],reviewRequests:[.reviewRequests[].login],checks:[.statusCheckRollup[]? | {name:.name,conclusion:.conclusion,status:.status}]}'

echo '=== Recent PR timeline events ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/issues/$pr_number/timeline" \
  -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select(.event == "labeled" or .event == "unlabeled" or .event == "ready_for_review" or .event == "converted_to_draft" or .event == "review_requested" or .event == "head_ref_force_pushed" or .event == "committed" or .event == "closed" or .event == "reopened") | {event,created_at,actor:(.actor.login // null),label:(.label.name // null),commit_id:(.commit_id // null)}'

Length of output: 3679

---

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration inspected

Length of output: 5450

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="raphaeltm/simple-agent-manager"
pr_number="1846"
head_sha=$(gh pr view "$pr_number" --repo "$repo" --json headRefOid --jq '.headRefOid')

echo '=== Pull request state and author ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr_number" \
  --jq '{number,created_at,updated_at,draft,user:{login:.user.login,type:.user.type},author_association}'

echo '=== Pull request reviews ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr_number/reviews" --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | {submitted_at,state,user:(.user.login // null),body}'

echo '=== Pull request issue comments with CodeRabbit mentions ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/issues/$pr_number/comments" --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select((.user.login | ascii_downcase | contains("coderabbit")) or (.body | ascii_downcase | contains("coderabbit"))) | {created_at,user:.user.login,body}'

echo '=== Check runs from CodeRabbit ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/$head_sha/check-runs" \
  -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' --paginate \
  --jq '.check_runs[] | select((.app.slug // "" | ascii_downcase | contains("coderabbit")) or (.name | ascii_downcase | contains("coderabbit"))) | {name,status,conclusion,started_at,completed_at,app:(.app.slug // null),details_url}'

echo '=== Pull request timeline: state-changing events ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/issues/$pr_number/timeline" \
  -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select(.event == "opened" or .event == "ready_for_review" or .event == "converted_to_draft" or .event == "synchronize" or .event == "review_requested" or .event == "committed") | {event,created_at,actor:(.actor.login // null),commit_id:(.commit_id // null),commit_url:(.commit_url // null)}'

Length of output: 2563

---

@raphaeltm The repository configuration did not suppress the review.

auto_review.enabled is true. This PR has no excluded label, base branch, title keyword, path, or configured username. It was also not a draft.

The relevant difference is the PR author. GitHub reports simple-agent-manager[bot] as the author. This is a GitHub App bot account. Bot-authored PRs can be skipped by automatic review safeguards to prevent automation loops.

GitHub shows no CodeRabbit check run, review, or comment on #1846. Therefore, CodeRabbit did not start an automatic review job.

I cannot distinguish, from the available GitHub data alone, between the bot-author safeguard and an internal event-delivery or processing failure. The bot author is the likely cause.

You can request a review explicitly with @coderabbitai review on the PR.

_{You are interacting with an AI system.}

[raphaeltm]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="raphaeltm/simple-agent-manager"
pr_number="1846"

echo '=== PR metadata ==='
gh pr view "$pr_number" --repo "$repo" \
  --json number,state,isDraft,createdAt,updatedAt,author,baseRefName,headRefName,labels,reviewRequests,statusCheckRollup \
  --jq '{number,state,isDraft,createdAt,updatedAt,author:.author.login,baseRefName,headRefName,labels:[.labels[].name],reviewRequests:[.reviewRequests[].login],checks:[.statusCheckRollup[]? | {name:.name,conclusion:.conclusion,status:.status}]}'

echo '=== Recent PR timeline events ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/issues/$pr_number/timeline" \
  -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select(.event == "labeled" or .event == "unlabeled" or .event == "ready_for_review" or .event == "converted_to_draft" or .event == "review_requested" or .event == "head_ref_force_pushed" or .event == "committed" or .event == "closed" or .event == "reopened") | {event,created_at,actor:(.actor.login // null),label:(.label.name // null),commit_id:(.commit_id // null)}'

Length of output: 3679

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration inspected

Length of output: 5450

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="raphaeltm/simple-agent-manager"
pr_number="1846"
head_sha=$(gh pr view "$pr_number" --repo "$repo" --json headRefOid --jq '.headRefOid')

echo '=== Pull request state and author ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr_number" \
  --jq '{number,created_at,updated_at,draft,user:{login:.user.login,type:.user.type},author_association}'

echo '=== Pull request reviews ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr_number/reviews" --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | {submitted_at,state,user:(.user.login // null),body}'

echo '=== Pull request issue comments with CodeRabbit mentions ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/issues/$pr_number/comments" --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select((.user.login | ascii_downcase | contains("coderabbit")) or (.body | ascii_downcase | contains("coderabbit"))) | {created_at,user:.user.login,body}'

echo '=== Check runs from CodeRabbit ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/$head_sha/check-runs" \
  -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' --paginate \
  --jq '.check_runs[] | select((.app.slug // "" | ascii_downcase | contains("coderabbit")) or (.name | ascii_downcase | contains("coderabbit"))) | {name,status,conclusion,started_at,completed_at,app:(.app.slug // null),details_url}'

echo '=== Pull request timeline: state-changing events ==='
gh api "repos/$repo/issues/$pr_number/timeline" \
  -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select(.event == "opened" or .event == "ready_for_review" or .event == "converted_to_draft" or .event == "synchronize" or .event == "review_requested" or .event == "committed") | {event,created_at,actor:(.actor.login // null),commit_id:(.commit_id // null),commit_url:(.commit_url // null)}'

Length of output: 2563

@raphaeltm The repository configuration did not suppress the review.

auto_review.enabled is true. This PR has no excluded label, base branch, title keyword, path, or configured username. It was also not a draft.

The relevant difference is the PR author. GitHub reports simple-agent-manager[bot] as the author. This is a GitHub App bot account. Bot-authored PRs can be skipped by automatic review safeguards to prevent automation loops.

GitHub shows no CodeRabbit check run, review, or comment on #1846. Therefore, CodeRabbit did not start an automatic review job.

I cannot distinguish, from the available GitHub data alone, between the bot-author safeguard and an internal event-delivery or processing failure. The bot author is the likely cause.

You can request a review explicitly with @coderabbitai review on the PR.

You are interacting with an AI system.

@coderabbitai is there any way for me to explicitly ask that PRs from that bot get reviewed? I do all my work through that bot.

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration inspected

Length of output: 5450

---

@raphaeltm Yes. For an individual pull request, add this top-level PR comment:

`@coderabbitai` review

That explicitly requests a review. You can have simple-agent-manager[bot] post that comment when it opens the PR, if its GitHub App permissions allow issue comments.

The current configuration has no setting to allow-list bot authors. reviews.auto_review.ignore_usernames only excludes authors. It cannot opt in simple-agent-manager[bot].

Therefore, there is no repository YAML change that I can recommend to restore automatic review for every PR from that bot. For a permanent automatic solution, contact CodeRabbit support and request a bot-author exception for:

simple-agent-manager[bot]

For now, use @coderabbitai review on each PR.

_{You are interacting with an AI system.}