Skip to content

docs: link TanStack DB integration to the internal RxDB collection page - #8972

Merged
pubkey merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
claude/tanstack-docs-integration-link-36q34r
Aug 18, 2026
Merged

docs: link TanStack DB integration to the internal RxDB collection page#8972
pubkey merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
claude/tanstack-docs-integration-link-36q34r

Conversation

@pubkey

@pubkey pubkey commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This PR contains:

  • IMPROVED DOCS

Describe the problem you have without this PR

In the docs sidebar, the Integrations category listed TanStack DB as an external link to https://tanstack.com/db/latest/docs/collections/rxdb-collection opening in a new tab. Every other integration entry points to a page on rxdb.info, and the repo already has a full internal page for this integration at docs-src/docs/articles/tanstack-db/rxdb-collection-for-tanstack-db.md, plus a whole TanStack DB article cluster under it. Sending users off-site from the sidebar loses them before they see any of that.

The entry now points to the internal page:

{
  type: 'ref',
  id: 'articles/tanstack-db/rxdb-collection-for-tanstack-db',
  label: 'TanStack DB'
}

ref is used instead of doc because the same document is already part of the Articles > TanStack DB category, and ref links to it without claiming a second sidebar association for the page. The official TanStack collection docs are not lost: the internal page links to them in its "How the Integration Works" section.

Todos

  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • Typings
  • Changelog

Generated by Claude Code

The Integrations sidebar entry pointed to tanstack.com instead of the
RxDB docs page about the TanStack DB integration. It now links to
articles/tanstack-db/rxdb-collection-for-tanstack-db, which itself links
out to the official TanStack collection docs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0143KS4RfYxJPK6zqabyjPo4
@pubkey
pubkey merged commit 1cc6e73 into master Aug 18, 2026
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants