Remove note to closed issue in heatexchanger tutorial - #917
Conversation
|
I think there has been a misunderstanding here. The note is still relevant for the |
|
I think if you link to an issue that is "closed as complete", people (including me) will think this is done. I suggest making it explicit what you are looking for. The issue is the large mesh, right?
|
|
I understand the confusion, and the note can be improved. I will open another PR, since this is now closed. I also changed the issue to "closed as not planned" (a feature that GitHub had introduced a few months before). |
Removes this note:
As the issue was closed due to the simplified heat exchanger tutorial.
#6
Checklist
changelog-entries/<PRnumber>.md.requirements.txtfiles, I regenerated siblingrequirements-reference.txtfiles withpython3 tools/releasing/update-requirements-reference.py(pass a path to update only that directory, or--allto refresh everything).