Skip to content

Drop the unused KB article attachment styles - #38

Merged
paul999 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
issue-21/drop-kb-attachment-styles
Sep 18, 2026
Merged

paul999 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
issue-21/drop-kb-attachment-styles

Conversation

@paul999

@paul999 paul999 commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removes the .kb-article-attachments and .kb-article-filesize rules added in #36. Nothing uses them any more.

phpbb/phpbb-website-private#21 no longer lists forum attachments on knowledge base articles. Images an article needs go into the website's repository instead, and the attachments section was taken out of the article page (branch issue-21/kb-article). A search of this repo finds no other use of those classes. The footer panel, now holding only the support-topic link, keeps its styles.

After this merges, composer update phpbb/website-assets goes into the #21 branch.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

phpbb/phpbb-website-private#21 no longer lists forum attachments on
knowledge base articles: images an article needs go into the website's
repository instead. The .kb-article-attachments and .kb-article-filesize
rules from #36 have nothing left to style.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 18, 2026 15:58
@paul999
paul999 merged commit 2a2bf65 into master Sep 18, 2026
1 check passed

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

No unresolved issues were identified.

Pull request overview

Removes obsolete knowledge-base article attachment CSS while preserving support-topic footer styling.

Changes:

  • Deletes unused attachment and filesize rules.
  • Updates the footer comment.
File summaries
File Description
css/support_docs.css Removes obsolete attachment styles and retains footer link styles.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants