Skip to content

ci(release): concurrency groups; shared verify-version action - #210

Merged
Troublor merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
troublor/ci/release-hardening
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

Troublor merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
troublor/ci/release-hardening

Conversation

@Troublor

@Troublor Troublor commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Follow-ups from the review of #207, generalised in megaeth-labs/.github#34 and applied here.

  • Concurrency groups on the three core release workflows, all cancel-in-progress: false: one candidate at a time (github.workflow), one settle per version (inputs.version), one publish per release branch (pull_request.base.ref). on-release.yml already has its per-tag group from ci: attach the release binaries to the GitHub Release #207. Each of these workflows ends in a push or a tag that must never be cancelled half-way, and none is atomic with its own guard, so a second run queues instead of overlapping.
  • release-verify-version@main replaces the inline version gate in on-release.yml: same semantics (stateless-validator X.Y.Z expected; warning on a rehearsal, hard stop on a release), and a binary that cannot run fails even on a dry run. The debug-trace-server --help load check stays as its own step, since that binary has no version flag.

Merge after megaeth-labs/.github#34, which adds the action. Main only: release-v2.0.18 keeps the inline check it gets from #209, which is equivalent for the in-flight release. Workflow-only change.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-09T06:44:27.737518Z 7a95ec3 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@mega-maxwell

mega-maxwell Bot commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Claude review status

Living comment — rewritten in place. The review workflow keeps this single comment up to date instead of posting a new one each round, so it always describes the latest reviewed commit and the earlier text is intentionally gone. No reply is needed here; reply to a finding in its own review thread, and answer an open question in a reply on this PR. The next review round reconciles your answer.

✅ Review clean

Last reviewed: 19d5ac65..7a95ec3c · updated 2026-09-09T06:43:30+00:00

New this round: 0 finding(s), 0 question(s) · Resolved this round: 0 · Open questions: 0

- The three core release workflows get a concurrency group with
  cancel-in-progress: false: one candidate at a time, one settle per
  version, one publish per release branch (on-release already has its
  per-tag group). Each ends in a push or a tag that must never be
  cancelled half-way, and none is atomic with its own guard.
- The inline version gate in on-release becomes the shared
  release-verify-version action, with the debug-trace-server load check
  kept as its own step.

Mirrors the org templates (megaeth-labs/.github#34). Main only: the
in-flight release-v2.0.18 keeps the inline check from #209.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 19d5ac65c0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/release-candidate.yml Outdated
release-candidate and release-publish also start on every PR closing on
their branch, and GitHub keeps one pending run per concurrency group,
so the workflow-wide group let an unrelated closure evict a queued cut
or publish. The groups now sit on the gated jobs (propose, cut,
publish); a skipped job holds no slot.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Troublor
Troublor merged commit 71c7cb3 into main Sep 9, 2026
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant