Skip to content

Document the native aarch64-pc-windows-msvc build - #37

Merged
mattpodwysocki merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/163-windows-arm-target
Sep 23, 2026
Merged

mattpodwysocki merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/163-windows-arm-target

Conversation

@mattpodwysocki

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Companion doc update for adding a native aarch64-pc-windows-msvc CI build (the workflow change lives in the private release pipeline, since that's where build-and-publish.yml lives).

  • README: "six targets" now, not five, with the new one listed.
  • CHANGELOG: ## Unreleased entry under ### Added.

No code changed here — install.ps1 already asked the manifest for this target before falling back to the x64 one, and .cargo/config.toml already named it; publishing the artifact from CI is the only change needed, and this is the doc half of that.

Test plan

  • cargo test --test source_guards --test docs_contract (American-English guard, docs/binary-surface contract) — clean

Windows on Arm ran the x64 build under emulation before this — including
inside a VM on Apple Silicon, the larger of the two populations this
serves. install.ps1 already asked the manifest for the native target
before falling back to the x64 one, and .cargo/config.toml already named
it, so publishing the artifact was the whole client-side change; this is
the doc side of that.

Six targets now, not five.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@mattpodwysocki
mattpodwysocki requested a review from a team as a code owner September 22, 2026 17:58
zmofei
zmofei previously approved these changes Sep 23, 2026
zmofei
zmofei previously approved these changes Sep 23, 2026
@mattpodwysocki
mattpodwysocki merged commit 78fe715 into main Sep 23, 2026
8 checks passed
@mattpodwysocki
mattpodwysocki deleted the docs/163-windows-arm-target branch September 23, 2026 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants