Why:
The GitHub Docs content linter reports three reproducible errors in the contributor style guide. These are documentation-quality defects in the source file and can be fixed without changing product guidance.
What article on docs.github.com is affected?
GitHub Docs style guide
What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
- Specify a language for the fenced URL example at
content/contributing/style-guide-and-content-model/style-guide.md:193 so it satisfies MD040.
- Add the documented third-party-action disclaimer reusable to the two
google-github-actions/setup-gcloud examples at lines 949 and 961 so they satisfy GHD054 and model the required convention.
The surrounding guidance already defines both requirements, so this change only brings the examples into compliance.
Additional information
Reproduced with Node.js v24.19.0:
npm run lint-content -- --paths content/contributing/style-guide-and-content-model/style-guide.md --rules MD040
npm run lint-content -- --paths content/contributing/style-guide-and-content-model/style-guide.md --rules GHD054
The first command reports MD040 at line 193. The second reports GHD054 at lines 949 and 961. I found no existing issue or pull request covering these three errors. This is a content-only change; no workflow, generated, or translated files are involved.
Why:
The GitHub Docs content linter reports three reproducible errors in the contributor style guide. These are documentation-quality defects in the source file and can be fixed without changing product guidance.
What article on docs.github.com is affected?
GitHub Docs style guide
What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
content/contributing/style-guide-and-content-model/style-guide.md:193so it satisfiesMD040.google-github-actions/setup-gcloudexamples at lines 949 and 961 so they satisfyGHD054and model the required convention.The surrounding guidance already defines both requirements, so this change only brings the examples into compliance.
Additional information
Reproduced with Node.js v24.19.0:
The first command reports
MD040at line 193. The second reportsGHD054at lines 949 and 961. I found no existing issue or pull request covering these three errors. This is a content-only change; no workflow, generated, or translated files are involved.