Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency hono to ^4.13.5 [security] - #2784

Open
renovate-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
ghiscoding:masterfrom
renovate-bot:renovate/npm-hono-vulnerability
Open

chore(deps): update dependency hono to ^4.13.5 [security]#2784
renovate-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
ghiscoding:masterfrom
renovate-bot:renovate/npm-hono-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
hono (source) ^4.13.4^4.13.5 age confidence

Hono: Query parser reads parameters after the URL fragment, causing cache-key and proxy interpretation differentials

CVE-2026-84363 / GHSA-crvj-82cr-hjcx

More information

Details

Summary

Hono's query parsing does not stop at the URL fragment: a ? appearing after a # is treated as the start of a query string. As a result, the application can read request parameters that no other component involved in handling the request can see.

Details

A fragment is never part of the query, and every standard URL consumer — browsers, new URL(), reverse proxies — ignores everything from the first # onward. Hono's routing followed that rule; its query helpers did not.

For one and the same request, this produces an interpretation differential:

  • A component in front of the application that inspects the query string — filtering rules, parameter allow/deny lists, access logging — observes no parameters, while the application reads and acts on them.
  • The cache middleware removed the fragment when building its cache key, so a response influenced by parameters carried inside the fragment could be stored under a key that did not reflect them and later returned to other users.

The same divergence reaches request validation and any middleware that reads query parameters.

This requires a request target containing a literal # to reach the application. Deployments on runtimes that normalise such a target — including Cloudflare Workers — are not affected, and neither are those behind an intermediary that strips the fragment.

Impact

An attacker can cause the application to act on parameters that components in front of it never observe.

This may lead to:

  • filtering rules, allow/deny lists, and audit logging being blind to parameters the application still processes
  • a cached response being stored under a key that does not reflect the parameters used to produce it, and served to other users
  • stored cross-site scripting, where such a parameter is reflected into a cached HTML response without escaping

This issue affects applications that read query parameters and run on a runtime that passes a literal # through to the request URL.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.9 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Hono: Unbounded dot-notation nesting in parseBody() can cause memory exhaustion

CVE-2026-84364 / GHSA-g6gw-c38x-mqfc

More information

Details

Summary

When parseBody() expands dot-separated form field names into nested objects, it does not limit the nesting depth or the total number of objects created. A request body well within a normal size limit can therefore allocate an object graph far larger than the request itself, and concurrent requests can exhaust the heap and terminate the process.

Details

Each dot-separated segment of a field name creates an intermediate object. Neither the segments within a single field name nor the total across a request was bounded, and empty segments were preserved, so a field name could encode one nesting level per byte.

Both shapes produce the effect: a single deeply dotted field name, and a large number of shallowly dotted ones within one body. A request body size limit does not prevent it, because the amplification happens after the body has been accepted.

Dot-notation parsing is not enabled by default.

Impact

An attacker who can reach an endpoint that parses request bodies with dot-notation enabled can send concurrent requests whose memory cost is disproportionate to their size.

This may lead to:

  • exhaustion of the JavaScript heap and termination of the server process
  • the service remaining unavailable until it is restarted

This issue affects applications that explicitly enable dot-notation parsing. Applications using the default behaviour are not affected.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Hono: Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-39408: toSSG() still writes files outside the output directory

CVE-2026-84365 / GHSA-gqvv-2mrq-wpjv

More information

Details

Summary

The fix released for CVE-2026-39408 does not cover every traversal sequence. toSSG() can still write files outside the configured output directory when a route parameter contains consecutive parent-directory segments.

Details

Static site generation builds each output path from the route path and the values supplied through ssgParams, then verifies that the result stays inside the output directory. That check normalizes the path with the same routine that built it, and the routine did not fully collapse runs of consecutive parent-directory segments. A value carrying enough of them produces a path the check accepts, but the filesystem resolves outside the output directory.

The earlier fix handled a single parent-directory segment, so it blocks the sequence reported at the time while leaving longer runs unhandled. The check also treated output directories that differ only in how they are rooted as equivalent.

This arises when an application generates a static site from route parameter values it does not fully control — slugs coming from a CMS, an API, or user submissions.

Impact

A value reaching ssgParams from an untrusted source can cause build output to be written outside the intended output directory, carrying whatever content the route handler produced.

This may lead to:

  • files being created or overwritten elsewhere in the build environment
  • generated artifacts or deployment output being altered

This affects build-time static site generation only; request-time routing is not affected. Applications whose ssgParams values are entirely developer-controlled are not affected.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 6.5 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

honojs/hono (hono)

v4.13.5

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@forking-renovate forking-renovate Bot added 📦 dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file 🤖 bot labels Sep 10, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.0%. Comparing base (c320faa) to head (5c9daa2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2784   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   100.0%   100.0%           
=======================================
  Files         199      199           
  Lines       25814    25814           
  Branches     9144     9144           
=======================================
  Hits        25814    25814           
Flag Coverage Δ
angular 100.0% <ø> (ø)
universal 100.0% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-new Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
angular-slickgrid

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/angular-slickgrid@2784

aurelia-slickgrid

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/aurelia-slickgrid@2784

slickgrid-react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/slickgrid-react@2784

slickgrid-vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/slickgrid-vue@2784

@slickgrid-universal/angular-row-detail-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/angular-row-detail-plugin@2784

@slickgrid-universal/aurelia-row-detail-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/aurelia-row-detail-plugin@2784

@slickgrid-universal/react-row-detail-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/react-row-detail-plugin@2784

@slickgrid-universal/vue-row-detail-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/vue-row-detail-plugin@2784

@slickgrid-universal/binding

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/binding@2784

@slickgrid-universal/common

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/common@2784

@slickgrid-universal/composite-editor-component

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/composite-editor-component@2784

@slickgrid-universal/custom-footer-component

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/custom-footer-component@2784

@slickgrid-universal/custom-tooltip-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/custom-tooltip-plugin@2784

@slickgrid-universal/empty-warning-component

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/empty-warning-component@2784

@slickgrid-universal/event-pub-sub

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/event-pub-sub@2784

@slickgrid-universal/excel-export

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/excel-export@2784

@slickgrid-universal/graphql

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/graphql@2784

@slickgrid-universal/odata

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/odata@2784

@slickgrid-universal/pagination-component

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/pagination-component@2784

@slickgrid-universal/pdf-export

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/pdf-export@2784

@slickgrid-universal/row-detail-view-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/row-detail-view-plugin@2784

@slickgrid-universal/rxjs-observable

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/rxjs-observable@2784

@slickgrid-universal/sql

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/sql@2784

@slickgrid-universal/text-export

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/text-export@2784

@slickgrid-universal/utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/utils@2784

@slickgrid-universal/vanilla-bundle

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/vanilla-bundle@2784

@slickgrid-universal/vanilla-force-bundle

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/vanilla-force-bundle@2784

@slickgrid-universal/web-mcp

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@slickgrid-universal/web-mcp@2784

commit: 5c9daa2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🤖 bot 📦 dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant