Rename package to pdfkernel - #1
Merged
Merged
Conversation
michaelgbcole
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 31, 2026 04:43
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
@folsom/tspdftopdfkernel.Why
The repository has been renamed to
pdfkernel, and the package name should communicate that this is a PDF core rather than a renderer while staying consistent across GitHub, npm, docs, and code examples.Developer impact
After the new package is published, consumers should install and import
pdfkernel:The existing
@folsom/tspdf@0.1.0npm release will need to be deprecated separately with a pointer topdfkernel; npm packages cannot be renamed in place.Validation
bun run checkbun run build(publint and are-the-types-wrong pass)bun run testbun run gate:spec(64/64)npm pack --dry-run(pdfkernel@0.1.0, 11 files)Local Bun is 1.3.10 while the repo lockfile targets Bun 1.4, so build/package validation was run with the lockfile temporarily set aside and restored unchanged.