Add regional egress interception repro#225
Draft
neekolas wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
e50b5cc to
016d605
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds a deployed reproduction for a container egress interception issue seen when a Worker uses a targeted region placement hint.
The
examples/egress-testssuite now deploys two workers.dev environments with the same egress interception configuration:global: no Worker placement hintregional:placement = { mode = "targeted", region = "aws:us-east-1" }The container applications use distinct names per environment so both can exist in the same account. The tests now run against a deployed Worker URL via
EGRESS_TEST_BASE_URLinstead ofWranglerDevRunner, because the issue only reproduces after deploying with the regional placement hint.Why
In the
regionaldeployment, outbound interception appears not to run. Requests that should be blocked bydeniedHosts/allowedHostsinstead return200, and requests that should be handled byoutboundByHost/ catch-alloutboundreach the actual target path and returnNot Found.The matching
globaldeployment passes the same tests.How to Reproduce
Deploy both environments to an account with Containers enabled:
cd examples/egress-tests npx wrangler deploy --env global npx wrangler deploy --env regionalRun the tests against each workers.dev URL:
Observed Results
Global passes:
Regional fails:
Representative regional failures:
Validation
npm run typecheckinexamples/egress-testsnpx wrangler deploy --env global --dry-runnpx wrangler deploy --env regional --dry-runglobaland confirmed 9/9 tests passregionaland confirmed 9/9 tests fail in the egress interception path