Skip to content

Release 4.5.0 - #556

Merged
ali-farhadi-cko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/4.5.0
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

ali-farhadi-cko merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/4.5.0

Conversation

@ali-farhadi-cko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Release 4.5.0

Bumps Frames and Checkout to 4.5.0.

Changes since 4.4.0

Version bump

  • Source/Core/Constants/Constants.swift
  • Checkout/Source/Validation/Constants.swift
  • Frames.podspec (version and pinned Checkout dependency)
  • Checkout.podspec
  • SPM sample project minimum version
  • Sample app Podfile.lock files refreshed via pod install

Tag 4.5.0 has been pushed to the release branch and will be moved to the merge commit on main after merge.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Bump Frames and Checkout to 4.5.0 in constants, podspecs, the SPM sample
project, and the sample app Podfile.lock files.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@agent-wall-e

agent-wall-e Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🟡 Risk Classification: MINOR

Approval route: AI Review + Human Approval
Rollback controls: Staged rollout + rollback

Classification reasons

  • no_low_class_matched
  • prod_source_modified

Operational gates

  • ✅ jira_ticket
  • ✅ independent_review

Files analysed: 7


wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · policy 6b4ce2b3b45a…

@agent-wall-e

agent-wall-e Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
🔬 Debug — why this classification?

Each reason code emitted by the classifier, its source clause in the AI in SDLC Control Framework, and what it means.

Reason code Kind Clause Meaning
no_low_class_matched informational §2.2 (fall-through) None of the deterministic Low classes (§2.2.3, §2.2.4, §2.2.7, docs-only) applied; classifier fell through to LLM evaluation.
prod_source_modified informational §2.1 M7 (informational) At least one file is non-doc, non-test, non-IaC — i.e. application source code was modified.

Kinds:

  • classifying — this rule contributed to the chosen tier.
  • informational — context only; did not by itself decide the tier.

See issue #3 for the proposal to formalise this map as Appendix A of the standards doc.

wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · debug

@agent-wall-e

agent-wall-e Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🟢 Advisory review: Looks good to me

This PR still needs a human approval — wall-e cannot auto-approve it. For what it's worth, I read the diff and found nothing I'd block on.

This is a straightforward version bump from 4.4.0 to 4.5.0 across all version strings, podspecs, and lockfiles; everything is internally consistent.

What I checked

  • All six files consistently update from 4.4.0 to 4.5.0 with no mismatches between podspecs, lockfiles, and Swift constants.
  • The Frames.podspec pinned Checkout dependency is updated from 4.4.0 to 4.5.0, matching the new Checkout.podspec version.
  • Both Podfile.lock files show updated checksums for Checkout and Frames, consistent with a pod install after the spec changes.
  • The Risk dependency in the lockfiles already reflects ~> 6.0.1 (the stated change from 4.0.1), so no further lockfile changes are needed here.

This is not an approval. wall-e cannot auto-approve this PR — it is an opinion to help whoever does. Advisory review · us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6 · wall-e 2026.06.19-02

@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@adrian-orlowski-cko adrian-orlowski-cko left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ali-farhadi-cko
ali-farhadi-cko merged commit 4191d3b into main Oct 7, 2026
9 of 10 checks passed

This branch had an error being deployed

1 failed deployment
CocoaPodsRelease — 84f3e9da Deployed Oct 6, 2026 by ali-farhadi-cko via publish #24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants