Promote dev to main: plan-role trust doc

[Atom-oh]

Promotes PR #26.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[github-actions]

🤖 AI Code Review (Claude Fable 5 chair · lens×model matrix)

_Cells (model/lens): codex/L2 codex/L3 codex/L4 codex/L5 _

Status: BLOCKED — CRITICAL/MAJOR issues must be resolved before merge

🛑 Forced FAIL due to coverage collapse: at most one vendor survived, so cross-verification across the lens x model matrix cannot happen — fail-closed regardless of the chair's judgment.

⚠️ Coverage degraded: model(s) [kiro-opus, kiro-gpt] had no response across every lens (invalid flag/missing binary/auth failure, etc.) — the review below was synthesized without them.

All four panel reviews came back empty, and my own verification against the base confirms the change is sound — the doc row now matches what .github/workflows/terraform.yml actually does. Final synthesized review:

---

PR #27 Review — Promote dev to main: plan-role trust doc (CHAIR synthesis)

Summary

This PR is a one-row documentation change in docs/runbooks/dev-repo-setup.md, updating the sample-awsops-ci-terraform-plan trust-matrix entry to document that the role's OIDC trust covers the three standing user branches (atomoh, ssminji, whchoi) in addition to main, dev, and pull_request. Chair verification against the base confirms this brings the doc into agreement with reality rather than out of it: terraform.yml already triggers plan on push: [main, dev, atomoh, ssminji, whchoi] using AWS_CI_TERRAFORM_PLAN_ROLE_ARN, so the prior row (main/dev/PR only) was the stale statement. All four panel cells (codex L2–L5) independently reported no findings.

Issues per lens

L2 — Code correctness

• None. (1/1 model: no findings.) Chair concurs — docs-only diff, no TS/React or Python code touched.

L3 — Security / AWS mutation safety

• None. (1/1 model: no findings.) Chair verified the substance anyway: the role being widened is ci-terraform-plan with ReadOnlyAccess — no ADR-005 mutation-freeze implication. The trust stays enumerated per-branch (StringLike on named refs + pull_request), honoring the runbook's own "never the repo-wide :* wildcard" rule, and the doc's CRITICAL sub rule (environment subs for deployers, branch-ref subs for build/plan jobs) is unaffected. No secrets, account IDs, ARNs, or live domains introduced (per docs/runbooks/CLAUDE.md).

L4 — Observability / data-integration correctness

• None. (1/1 model: no findings.) Chair concurs — no Steampipe, compliance, or AgentCore logic in scope.

L5 — Docs / ADR consistency

• None. (1/1 model: no findings.) Chair concurs and adds positive confirmation: the updated row is consistent with terraform.yml's trigger list and with the "Build/plan jobs carry no environment and present branch-ref subs" paragraph below the table. The edit is table content within an already-English table, so the runbook-body bilingual convention is not degraded by this diff.

Suggestions (non-blocking)

• The new cell phrasing "...:pull_request + refs main, dev, atomoh, ssminji, whchoi" is slightly more abbreviated than the sibling rows, which spell out full ...:ref:refs/heads/<branch> entries. Matching that format would make the trust-policy entries copy-paste comparable across rows. Cosmetic only.

Verdict

Unanimous empty panel, independently verified by the chair against base files and the workflow definition. No CRITICAL or MAJOR findings.

---

Triggered by commit c81c5468572f5928898a7e51118f9a0c61e6e635 · workflow: .github/workflows/pr-review.yml