-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 327
Add Cloud OAuth consent changelog #3079
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| layout: changelog | ||
| title: Appwrite Cloud OAuth consent now supports resource-bound authorization | ||
| date: 2026-07-03 | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Appwrite Cloud's OAuth consent flow now makes requested access easier to review before authorizing a connected app. The consent screen shows a read-only permission summary, grouping requested scopes into clear access rows so users can see what the app is asking for without accidentally changing the requested permission set. | ||
|
|
||
| For apps using Rich Authorization Requests, Appwrite Cloud now also lets users bind requested access to specific projects and organizations through `authorization_details`-based resource selection. Users can choose whether project and organization access applies broadly or only to selected resources, and Appwrite sends the resulting resource binding back when the request is approved. | ||
|
|
||
| This gives connected apps a clearer consent experience while keeping authorization precise: scopes describe the requested privileges, and `authorization_details` controls which Appwrite Cloud projects or organizations those privileges are bound to. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Most changelog entries close with an Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time! |
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
coverimage in frontmatterAlmost every changelog entry that describes a UI or product change includes a
coverfield (e.g.cover: /images/changelog/2025-07-03.avif) and a corresponding image file undersrc/images/changelog/. This entry has nocoverfield and no matching image exists in the repo. Because this particular change is a visual consent-screen redesign, a cover screenshot would be especially helpful for readers — without it the entry will render without a hero image while all surrounding entries have one.Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!