Skip to content

Lance foyer222 - #67525

Draft
zhangstar333 wants to merge 7 commits into
apache:branch-4.1from
zhangstar333:lance_foyer222
Draft

Lance foyer222#67525
zhangstar333 wants to merge 7 commits into
apache:branch-4.1from
zhangstar333:lance_foyer222

Conversation

@zhangstar333

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

### What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: None

Related PR: lance-format/lance-c#69

Problem Summary: Lance-C v0.1.8 now contains the upstream changes previously carried by the v0.1.7 PR apache#64 and runtime-filter patches. Upgrade the bundled source archive and checksum, remove both obsolete v0.1.7 patches, and retain only the current two-commit snapshot of upstream PR apache#69 for prepared FTS INDEX_ONLY plan scoping and explicit _rowid behavior.

### Release note

Upgrade the bundled Lance-C dependency to v0.1.8 and apply upstream PR apache#69.

### Check List (For Author)

- Test: Manual test
    - Verified the official archive MD5, applied PR apache#69 to a clean v0.1.8 archive with zero fuzz, compared every tracked file byte-for-byte with PR head 6f0fae4, checked shell syntax, Rustfmt, stale references, and upstream CI status
- Behavior changed: Yes. Prepared FTS INDEX_ONLY scans use the PR apache#69 plan rewrite without scanner-wide fast_search
- Does this need documentation: No
### What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: None

Related PR: lance-format/lance-c#73, lance-format/lance-c#74

Problem Summary: Pick the Lance-C third-party state from commit 417cd56 into the branch-4.1 Lance FTS branch. Upgrade the bundled release from v0.1.8 to v0.1.9, replace the obsolete PR apache#69 patch with PR apache#73, and rename the existing byte-identical PR apache#74 patch for the v0.1.9 base. Keep the branch-specific third-party changes outside the Lance-C section unchanged.

### Release note

None

### Check List (For Author)

- Test: No need to test (verified shell syntax, patch blob equality, stale-reference removal, and scoped staged paths; compilation and tests were not requested)
- Behavior changed: Yes. The bundled Lance-C version and patch baseline are updated.
- Does this need documentation: No
@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants