Repository navigation
Wait for a computable target length before unparsing truncating strings #1738
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+51
−10
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This pattern is very interesting. It's not how we usually implement suspensions but I wonder if we should move towards this? So the SuspendableOperation just contains a reference to the unparser and the unparser does the actual work, making it much more similar to how normal unparsers look.
We could make it even a bit more generic. For example, maybe something like this:
So the original unparser implements the test/continuation functions and the DelegatingSuspendableOperation just calls into that. This avoids needing multiple classes for each suspendable unparser as we have now. There's just the original Unparser, with some special functions used by the reuseable DelegatingSuspendableOperation. Note, I'm not a fan of the names, but it gets the point across.
This doesn't work as well if there is additional state that needs to be passed into the SuspendableOperation. I'm not sure if other Unparsers do that. Might not be worth if it they all work differently and need very different state.
Also note something we necessarily need to do now, but might be worth considering in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Created DAFFODIL-3102 to track