Skip to content

Add GLM-5.3, GLM-5.3-Flash, and Qwen3.8-Flash to SCNet Token Plan - #6168

Open
SlightDust wants to merge 1 commit into
anomalyco:devfrom
SlightDust:dev
Open

Add GLM-5.3, GLM-5.3-Flash, and Qwen3.8-Flash to SCNet Token Plan#6168
SlightDust wants to merge 1 commit into
anomalyco:devfrom
SlightDust:dev

Conversation

@SlightDust

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

SCNet has added new models to its Token Plan subscription. The models are now available in the post-subscription console view (model list + deduction multiplier table), and are confirmed working against the SCNet API (https://api.scnet.cn/api/llm/v1). All three are missing from the scnet-token-plan catalog.

Note on the docs page: the "可用模型" (available models) table at https://www.scnet.cn/ac/openapi/doc/2.0/moduleapi/plans/token-plan.html#可用模型 has not been updated yet, but the 综合扣减倍率 (deduction multiplier) table on the same page already lists both GLM-5.3-Flash (0.15) and Qwen3.8-Flash (0.14), confirming availability. GLM-5.3 has been on the docs available-models list since earlier but was never added to the catalog.

Models added:

  • GLM-5.3 -> zhipuai/glm-5.3
  • GLM-5.3-Flash -> zhipuai/glm-5.3-flash
  • Qwen3.8-Flash -> alibaba/qwen3.8-flash

All use base_model references to the existing lab models, with zero-cost entries to match the provider's prepaid-Credits pricing. Reasoning options follow the same conventions as the existing SCNet entries (toggle where enable_thinking is documented; reasoning_effort only for DeepSeek-V4 series).

Changes:

  • Add providers/scnet-token-plan/models/GLM-5.3.toml
  • Add providers/scnet-token-plan/models/GLM-5.3-Flash.toml
  • Add providers/scnet-token-plan/models/Qwen3.8-Flash.toml

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No actionable findings.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the reviewer: ready Automated review found no actionable items label Sep 3, 2026
@SlightDust

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

reviewer: ready Automated review found no actionable items

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant