Skip to content

fix(eth/downloader): fix sync fall behind because peer was reported timeout - #2495

Open
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit into
XinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:fix-downloader-request-ttl
Open

fix(eth/downloader): fix sync fall behind because peer was reported timeout#2495
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit into
XinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:fix-downloader-request-ttl

Conversation

@gzliudan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Proposed changes

The QoS constants were shrunk relative to upstream go-ethereum, which pinned requestTTL() to a hard 5 second ceiling: ttlLimit was 5s while ttlScaling (2) multiplied by rttMaxEstimate (5s) already exceeded it, so neither the measured RTT nor the confidence factor could ever influence the timeout.

Any peer that did not answer a single header request within 5 seconds was therefore reported as errTimeout and dropped. On a busy network this made a node that had fallen behind unable to recover: every sync round died in fetchHeight, the node dropped healthy peers faster than it could replace them, and it only advanced through propagated blocks, which cannot close a multi-thousand block gap.

Restore rttMaxEstimate, ttlScaling and ttlLimit to the upstream values so the timeout scales with the observed round-trip time again, and add a test covering requestTTL().

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
  • chore: Changes that don't change source code or tests
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • revert: Revert something
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Impacted Components

Which parts of the codebase does this PR touch?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Tested on a private network from the genesis block and monitored the chain operating correctly for multiple epochs.
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 17dd25e7-8df0-440a-aad6-ca036a4ddc92

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-downloader-request-ttl branch from a05e5bc to cbf12b0 Compare July 29, 2026 03:37
@gzliudan gzliudan changed the title fix(eth/downloader): restore upstream request TTL limits fix(eth/downloader): fix sync fall behind because peer was reported as errTimeout and dropped Jul 29, 2026
@gzliudan gzliudan changed the title fix(eth/downloader): fix sync fall behind because peer was reported as errTimeout and dropped fix(eth/downloader): fix sync fall behind because peer was reported as errTimeout Jul 29, 2026
@gzliudan gzliudan changed the title fix(eth/downloader): fix sync fall behind because peer was reported as errTimeout fix(eth/downloader): fix sync fall behind because peer was reported timeout Jul 29, 2026
…imeout

The QoS constants were shrunk relative to upstream go-ethereum, which pinned
requestTTL() to a hard 5 second ceiling: ttlLimit was 5s while ttlScaling
(2) multiplied by rttMaxEstimate (5s) already exceeded it, so neither the
measured RTT nor the confidence factor could ever influence the timeout.

Any peer that did not answer a single header request within 5 seconds was
therefore reported as errTimeout and dropped. On a busy network this made a
node that had fallen behind unable to recover: every sync round died in
fetchHeight, the node dropped healthy peers faster than it could replace
them, and it only advanced through propagated blocks, which cannot close a
multi-thousand block gap.

Restore rttMaxEstimate, ttlScaling and ttlLimit to the upstream values so
the timeout scales with the observed round-trip time again, and add a test
covering requestTTL().
@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-downloader-request-ttl branch from cbf12b0 to c45ff63 Compare July 29, 2026 03:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant