docs: CUE policy-authoring decision for Owen Gate + Sandboy pointer - #182
docs: CUE policy-authoring decision for Owen Gate + Sandboy pointer#182PhysShell wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Appends §8 to the Owen Gate design note: TOML's lack of merge semantics makes multi-profile policy (no-net / worktree-only / windows exec) copy-paste-prone, where a forgotten override silently reopens a denied capability. CUE's unification model turns a conflicting override into a compile error instead. Records Nickel as runner-up and Jsonnet/Dhall/HCL as considered-and-rejected, and reaffirms WIT/Wasmtime stays the untrusted-input plugin boundary, not a policy-authoring surface — cross-referenced from 007's zero-trust-framework.md.
sandboy/README.md's policy.example.toml is the plain, boring artifact Sandboy actually reads; adds a pointer to where the composable CUE source and the cue export --out toml render step are documented (007's zero-trust-framework.md), so the two stay clearly separated instead of drifting apart in two repos.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 36 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Консолидировано в #190 (§8-аддендум Generated by Claude Code |
2 participants
Что и зачем
Фиксирует решение по языку авторинга
owen.policy(CUE вместо TOML, из-заunification-семантики — конфликтующий override становится ошибкой компиляции,
а не тихим слиянием) как §8-аддендум к существующей design-note
docs/notes/agent-capability-layer.md("Owen Gate"). Плюс однострочныйпоинтер в
sandboy/README.mdна то, где документирован CUE→TOML render pipelineдля Sandboy-политик (007's
docs/zero-trust-framework.md). Часть болееширокой cross-repo методологии (007 + Own.NET + OwnAudit), не отдельная
фича — WIT/Wasmtime остаётся execution/plugin-границей (§0/§1 того же
документа), не меняется.
Тип изменения
Как проверено
python tests/run_tests.pyruff check .иmypypython scripts/<...>.py --selftest)Связанные issue
Нет.
Чеклист
feat:,fix:,docs:…)Generated by Claude Code