docs(proposals): P-026 C# strictness retrofit profile (own audit strictness) - #178
docs(proposals): P-026 C# strictness retrofit profile (own audit strictness)#178PhysShell wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ctness) A framing/packaging proposal, not a new engine: front the existing fleet's findings (lifetime/resource, typestate/obligations, config drift) under one strictness narrative + a single score aimed at the F#/Rust-refugee audience. Accepts the strictness-audit framing and keeps ownership/lifetime as the moat; explicitly rejects an Option/Result migration linter and a generic nullable nag as the SAST fight the charter refuses. Records the honest gap: a whole-solution score depends on the not-yet-general Roslyn extractor (P-001/P-014), so the first cut runs over the audit target or labels dimensions NO-TOOL rather than faking a clean pass. Adds the P-026 index row. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YNzzRHgdDbue9LhWyLTui3
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 40 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Консолидировано в #190 (документ вошёл как Generated by Claude Code |
2 participants
A framing/packaging proposal, not a new engine: front the existing fleet's
findings (lifetime/resource, typestate/obligations, config drift) under one
strictness narrative + a single score aimed at the F#/Rust-refugee audience.
Accepts the strictness-audit framing and keeps ownership/lifetime as the moat;
explicitly rejects an Option/Result migration linter and a generic nullable nag
as the SAST fight the charter refuses. Records the honest gap: a whole-solution
score depends on the not-yet-general Roslyn extractor (P-001/P-014), so the first
cut runs over the audit target or labels dimensions NO-TOOL rather than faking a
clean pass. Adds the P-026 index row.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 noreply@anthropic.com
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YNzzRHgdDbue9LhWyLTui3