-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Security: cap E-RTMP multitrack sub-track count (fixes #131) #132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
AlexanderWagnerDev
merged 17 commits into
main
from
cursor/application-security-review-6876
Jul 16, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e434363
Cap E-RTMP multitrack sub-track count to prevent CPU amplification
cursoragent a8cbdd2
chore: apply PR 132 review fix
AlexanderWagnerDev e8f48da
chore: make PR 132 patch workflow robust
AlexanderWagnerDev 92884df
ci: trigger PR 132 review fix
AlexanderWagnerDev 36ef553
ci: run PR 132 fix on synchronization
AlexanderWagnerDev 70dbdaf
ci: prepare PR 132 review patch
AlexanderWagnerDev c76b077
ci: apply and validate PR 132 review fix
AlexanderWagnerDev ce27bb9
ci: capture PR 132 patch diagnostics
AlexanderWagnerDev acbf55d
Apply multitrack rejection fix for validation
github-actions[bot] b359cda
ci: restore standard tests workflow
AlexanderWagnerDev 54f9ea2
test: fully reassemble oversized multitrack message
AlexanderWagnerDev d253531
Apply multitrack rejection fix for validation
github-actions[bot] 206b463
ci: remove PR 132 patch workflow
AlexanderWagnerDev 48db43d
ci: remove PR 132 patch trigger
AlexanderWagnerDev 883e50a
ci: remove PR 132 patch script
AlexanderWagnerDev 8ad1c43
ci: remove PR 132 test log
AlexanderWagnerDev 98165fb
ci: remove PR 132 test status
AlexanderWagnerDev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When a publisher sends a multitrack container with more than 4096 subtracks, this new branch makes
foreach_trackreturnfalse, but callers such asConn::handle_media_messageandClient::deliver_av_frame_cbinterpretfalseas “not multitrack” and then invoke the normal single-frame callback/relay path. That means the over-limit packet is not actually rejected at the session/client layer; it is reclassified as an opaque ordinary media frame. Please return a distinguishable parse error/drop signal, or have callers avoid the fallback whenis_multitrack_container(...)was true.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.