Skip to content

docs(multi-executor): remove reference to single executor (#295)#328

Merged
Dimfacion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue/295
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

docs(multi-executor): remove reference to single executor (#295)#328
Dimfacion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue/295

Conversation

@Dimfacion

@Dimfacion Dimfacion commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Proposed changes

  • Removing reference to only single connector

Related issues

How to test this PR

Checklist

  • The PR title follows the Conventional Commits convention type(scope?): description (#issue)
  • I signed my commits
  • This PR is linked to an issue
  • I consider the submitted work as finished
  • I tested the code for its functionality
  • I added/updated the relevant documentation
  • Where necessary, I refactored code to improve the overall quality

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 15, 2026 09:16

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the Integration Manager documentation to remove wording that implied only a single managed instance/executor could exist, aligning the docs with the “multiple instances from the catalog” capability referenced in #295.

Changes:

  • Adjusted the “Browsing the catalog” section to point readers to the dedicated pages for managing already-deployed items.
  • Relaxed the migration prerequisites by removing the “no existing managed instance” constraint for external connectors.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread docs/deployment/ecosystem/integration-manager/overview.md Outdated
@Dimfacion Dimfacion merged commit 513a0d9 into main Jun 15, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs(multi-exec): explain the possibility to run multiple instances of the same item from the catalog

3 participants