[19.0][FIX] dms: Taking archived users into account - #513 - #514
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Use Case Example: - Create an archived user (an employee’s user account that will be activated in the future) - Create a group that explicitly includes the user created earlier (this is done indirectly using `hr_dms_field`) - The `users` field does not contain this user TT64366
pedrobaeza
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2026
carlos-lopez-tecnativa
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2026
Member
|
/ocabot merge patch |
Contributor
|
Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you. |
Contributor
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 81a6b1e. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
FWP from 18.0: #513
Taking archived users into account
Use Case Example:
hr_dms_field)usersfield does not contain this userPlease @pedrobaeza and @carlos-lopez-tecnativa can you review it?
@Tecnativa TT64366