Skip to content

Add Nested Shared Folder (NSF) support to CyberArk PAM import - #2233

Open
pvagare-ks wants to merge 6 commits into
KC-1355from
KC-1246-nsf-int
Open

Add Nested Shared Folder (NSF) support to CyberArk PAM import#2233
pvagare-ks wants to merge 6 commits into
KC-1355from
KC-1246-nsf-int

Conversation

@pvagare-ks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds --nsf to pam project cyberark-import so CyberArk migrations can create project folders, records and PAM configuration under Nested Shared Folders instead of classic shared folders.

Changes

  • Added pam project cyberark-import <cybeark_tenant> --nsf command for creating nsf folders, pam records and pam config

@pvagare-ks pvagare-ks self-assigned this Jul 20, 2026
Comment thread keepercommander/commands/pam_import/cyberark_import.py Outdated
Comment thread keepercommander/commands/pam_import/cyberark_import.py Outdated
Comment thread keepercommander/commands/pam_import/cyberark_import.py Outdated
Comment thread keepercommander/commands/pam_import/cyberark_import.py Outdated
Comment thread keepercommander/importer/cyberark/pam/idempotency.py Outdated
Comment thread keepercommander/importer/cyberark/pam/idempotency.py Outdated
Comment thread tests/test_cyberark_pam_import.py Outdated
Comment thread tests/test_cyberark_pam_import.py Outdated
"--platform-map", "map.json",
"--state-filter", "active,inactive",
"--no-verify-ssl",
"--nsf",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

use nsf as default and add classic flow as a flag

@adeshmukh-ks adeshmukh-ks left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if possible change the code to make nsf as default flow and classic folder flow to be on using a flag

@pvagare-ks
pvagare-ks requested a review from sali-ks July 27, 2026 18:33
@pvagare-ks
pvagare-ks requested a review from adeshmukh-ks July 28, 2026 05:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants