blog: batch-1 editorial tiers — 20 posts, operator-ruled (TIN-2981) - #237
blog: batch-1 editorial tiers — 20 posts, operator-ruled (TIN-2981)#237Jesssullivan wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
📝 Blog Post ReviewFound 20 blog post(s) in this PR:
Schema Validation✅ All posts pass schema validation. Hyperlink Suggestions
Slash Commands
|
|
Parked with editorial tier/salience work outside this week's source-truth and stable-v5 lanes. Operator rulings and commit remain recoverable. Closing without deleting the branch. |
|
Parked per the 2026-08-12 hygiene-week plan: hard pre-merge parity gate — the 3 Tinyland-managed counterpart posts must carry |
|
Order correction (TIN-2983's own description is authoritative over my previous comment): the chain is spoke batch lands first → then the hub-side managed-mirror import ( |
All 20 proposals accepted as posted on TIN-2981 (operator interview, 2026-07-17): 10 noteworthy (XRAM/NVMe pair, Canon 5B00, XGS-PON, UV glue, Chapel/Dhall probes, WinRM/PSRP, trashmonitor, zig libraries, aperture/ tsnet, mutual-aid service) and 10 less-noteworthy (three week-notes, gingersnap, resume, darwin-nic announce, ligature fixture, life-update, accuwix). Frontmatter-only editorial_tier additions matching the existing KVM-post style — no body edits, no display-behavior change until tier surfacing lands (TIN-2984). Posts tests 39/39; index regeneration clean.
e1c7f0e to
4d56bd3
Compare
|
Reopened and rebased onto current main (
This is structural, not a stale-snapshot nit:
So any extra frontmatter key on a post carrying Scope check: 3 of the 20 posts in this batch carry Hosted results on
Two ways forward, both operator calls: land the 17 non-projected posts now and carry the three projected ones with the projection-contract change, or extend the contract first and land all 20 together. Leaving this open as draft pending that call. |
|
Re-parking after the concurrent re-open. The hosted failure confirms this editorial batch needs a separate projection-contract wave; it is outside the approved stable-v5 and canonical-Pulse source-truth lanes for this week. Branch and the detailed diagnosis remain recoverable. Do not stack more implementation onto this draft until the two active lanes land and TIN-2981/TIN-2983 are deliberately rescheduled. |
What
Exactly 20 one-line
editorial_tierfrontmatter additions encoding the operator's 2026-07-17 batch-1 ruling: 10noteworthy, 10less-noteworthy. No post bodies or unrelated frontmatter fields change.Authority and sequencing
This is not a spoke-only, parity-inert edit. Three selected posts already have managed Tinyland counterparts whose canonical records/projections do not yet carry the same tier:
2026-03-04-week-notes-cyborgs-servers-and-sending.md2026-03-21-week-notes-indeterminism-passkeys-and-spring.md2026-03-13-the-winrm-forkbomb-how-ansible-molecule-locks-you-out-of-active-directory.mdTIN-2983 is therefore a pre-merge parity/import gate. The managed source and generated projections must be updated and verified before this PR can merge. TIN-2984 then verifies the end-to-end projection/reader contract.
Local validation
['less-noteworthy', 'noteworthy']Current disposition
Draft and blocked. A merge is a production deployment and is not appropriate while parity is red or the reader promotion prerequisites remain open.
Linear: TIN-2981, TIN-2983, TIN-2984