Skip to content

feat(remote-config)!: agentless RC fetcher#2112

Open
paullegranddc wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
paullgdc/remote_config/agentless_fetcher
Open

feat(remote-config)!: agentless RC fetcher#2112
paullegranddc wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
paullgdc/remote_config/agentless_fetcher

Conversation

@paullegranddc

@paullegranddc paullegranddc commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Motivation

In some environments (serverless, Datadog studio), tracers can't rely on a Datadog Agent to proxy Remote Config requests. This PR adds an agentless mode to libdd-remote-config so the fetcher can talk directly to the RC backend, mirroring what the Go agent does today.

The protocol is different from the agent's /v0.7/config: the backend speaks protobuf and ships raw TUF metadata + target files that the client must verify locally. This means embedding TUF trust roots per site and running a full Uptane-style validation on every poll.

Changes

  • Add a new AgentlessFetcher in libdd-remote-config/src/fetch/agentless.rs:
    • TUF verification of director + config repositories using rust-tuf (DataDog fork of the library).
    • Embedded trust roots for prod, staging and gov, selected from the endpoint host. Roots can also be overridden from disk via AgentlessConfig.
    • Hash + length verification of every target against TUF-validated metadata before exposing it to the caller.
  • Plug agentless mode into the existing ConfigFetcher:
    • New AgentlessConfig. When set the fetcher dispatches to AgentlessFetcher instead of the agent HTTP path. Invalid configs (empty hostname, non-https endpoint, no API key) downgrade to agent mode with log.
    • ConfigFetcher::new is now async since TUF root loading is async. The agent-only path is still immediate.
    • Propagate the server-recommended refresh interval through ConfigClientState and into the SharedFetcher run loop.
  • Add libdd_common::machine_id (Linux / macOS / Windows), mirroring pkg/util/uuid.GetUUID() in the Go agent. Used as the agent_uuid field in the backend request.
  • update libdd-trace-protobuf/remoteconfig.proto to be in sybc with the agent version (LatestConfigsRequest/Response, ConfigMetas, DirectorMetas, ClientUpdater, ConfigStatus, …) to talk to the backend.
  • Update the remote_config_fetch example to switch to agentless when DD_API_KEY + DD_SITE are set.# Additional Notes

How to test the change?

   DD_API_KEY=... DD_SITE=datadoghq.com \
     cargo run -p libdd-remote-config --example remote_config_fetch

Also this has been tested in dd-trace-rs
DataDog/dd-trace-rs#263

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipelines  Tests

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 8 Pipeline jobs failed

Lint | Valid LICENSE-3rdparty.csv   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

Lint | clippy #windows-latest stable   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

DataDog/apm-reliability/libdatadog | benchmarks   View in Datadog   GitLab

View all 8 failed jobs.

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 29.17%
Overall Coverage: 73.49% (-0.43%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 54b4e97 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 8040 documentation warning(s) found

📦 datadog-sidecar-ffi - 3114 warning(s)

📦 datadog-sidecar - 2846 warning(s)

📦 libdd-common - 170 warning(s)

📦 libdd-remote-config - 649 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-protobuf - 218 warning(s)

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 1043 warning(s)


Updated: 2026-06-23 15:41:46 UTC | Commit: 9c913bd | missing-docs job results

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

  • Base Branch: origin/main
  • PR Branch: origin/paullgdc/remote_config/agentless_fetcher

Summary by Rule

Rule Base Branch PR Branch Change
expect_used 2 3 ⚠️ +1 (+50.0%)
unwrap_used 11 11 No change (0%)
Total 13 14 ⚠️ +1 (+7.7%)

Annotation Counts by File

File Base Branch PR Branch Change
datadog-sidecar/src/service/sidecar_server.rs 6 6 No change (0%)
libdd-common/src/lib.rs 6 6 No change (0%)
libdd-remote-config/src/fetch/fetcher.rs 1 2 ⚠️ +1 (+100.0%)

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate Base Branch PR Branch Change
clippy-annotation-reporter 5 5 No change (0%)
datadog-ffe-ffi 1 1 No change (0%)
datadog-ipc 22 22 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger-ffi 10 10 No change (0%)
datadog-profiling-replayer 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar 45 45 No change (0%)
libdd-common 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-common-ffi 12 12 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline 6 6 No change (0%)
libdd-ddsketch 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-profiling 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-remote-config 3 4 ⚠️ +1 (+33.3%)
libdd-telemetry 20 20 No change (0%)
libdd-tinybytes 4 4 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-normalization 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-stats 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils 11 11 No change (0%)
Total 182 183 ⚠️ +1 (+0.5%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 29 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 datadog-sidecar-ffi - 7 error(s)

Show output
error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:37:1
   │
37 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
     │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
     └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

error[unmaintained]: paste - no longer maintained
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:274:1
    │
274 │ paste 1.0.15 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2024-0436
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0436
    ├ The creator of the crate `paste` has stated in the [`README.md`](https://github.com/dtolnay/paste/blob/master/README.md) 
      that this project is not longer maintained as well as archived the repository
      
      ## Possible Alternative(s)
      
      - [`pastey`]: a fork of paste and is aimed to be a drop-in replacement with additional features for paste crate
      - [`with_builtin_macros`]: crate providing a [superset of `paste`'s functionality including general `macro_rules!` eager expansions](https://docs.rs/with_builtin_macros/0.1.0/with_builtin_macros/macro.with_eager_expansions.html)  and `concat!`/`concat_idents!` macros
      
      [`pastey`]: https://crates.io/crates/pastey
      [`with_builtin_macros`]: https://crates.io/crates/with_builtin_macros
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/dtolnay/paste
    ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
    ├ paste v1.0.15
      ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-libunwind-sys v1.0.2
      │   └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │       └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0
      │           ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │           └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0
      │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      └── rmp v0.8.14
          ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
          │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
          │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
          │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
          │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │   └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
          ├── rmp-serde v1.3.0
          │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │   ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
          │   │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
          │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
          │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
          │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
          └── rmpv v1.3.0
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:304:1
    │
304 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:334:1
    │
334 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:334:1
    │
334 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:334:1
    │
334 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:396:1
    │
396 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar-ffi v0.0.1 (*)
      │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
                  ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
                  └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 datadog-sidecar - 6 error(s)

Show output
error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:37:1
   │
37 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:302:1
    │
302 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:332:1
    │
332 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:332:1
    │
332 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:332:1
    │
332 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v36.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v36.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:394:1
    │
394 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
                  ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
                  └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-common - 6 error(s)

Show output
error[vulnerability]: NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation enters unbounded loop on cross-zone responses
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:64:1
   │
64 │ hickory-proto 0.25.2 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0118
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0118
   ├ The NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation in `hickory-proto`'s
     `DnssecDnsHandle` walks from the QNAME up to the SOA owner name, building a
     list of candidate encloser names. The iterator used assumes the
     QNAME is a descendant of the SOA owner, terminating only when the current
     candidate equals the SOA name. When the SOA in a response's authority section
     is not an ancestor of the QNAME, the loop stalls at the DNS root and never
     terminates, repeatedly calling `Name::base_name()` and pushing newly allocated
     `Name` and hashed-name entries into the candidate `Vec`.
     
     The bug is reachable by any caller of `DnssecDnsHandle` — including the
     resolver, recursor, and client — when built with the `dnssec-ring` or
     `dnssec-aws-lc-rs` feature and configured to perform DNSSEC validation. It is
     triggered while validating a NoData or NXDomain response whose authority
     section contains an SOA record from a zone other than an ancestor of the
     QNAME, on a code path that requires NSEC3 closest-encloser proof. In practice
     this can be reached through an insecure CNAME chain that crosses zone
     boundaries into a DNSSEC-signed zone returning NoData, but the minimum
     condition is just a mismatched SOA owner on a response requiring NSEC3
     validation.
     
     A `debug_assert_ne!(name, Name::root())` guards the loop body, so debug builds
     abort with a panic on the first iteration past the root. Release builds
     compile the assertion out and run the loop unbounded, allocating until the
     process exhausts available memory (OOM). A reachable upstream attacker who
     can return such a response can therefore crash a debug-built validator or
     exhaust memory on a release-built one.
     
     The affected code was migrated from `hickory-proto` to `hickory-net` as part of
     the 0.26.0 release. The `hickory-proto` 0.26.x release no longer offers
     `DnssecDnsHandle` and so we recommend all affected users update to `hickory-net`
     0.26.1 when the implementation of that type is required.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-3v94-mw7p-v465
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ hickory-proto v0.25.2
     └── hickory-resolver v0.25.2
         └── reqwest v0.13.2
             └── libdd-common v5.0.0

error[vulnerability]: CPU exhaustion during message encoding due to O(n²) name compression
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:64:1
   │
64 │ hickory-proto 0.25.2 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0119
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0119
   ├ During message encoding, `hickory-proto`'s `BinEncoder` stores pointers to
     labels that are candidates for name compression in a `Vec<(usize, Vec<u8>)>`.
     The name compression logic then searches for matches with a linear scan.
     
     A malicious message with many records can both introduce many candidate labels,
     and invoke this linear scan many times. This can amplify CPU exhaustion in DoS
     attacks.
     
     This is similar to
     [CVE-2024-8508](https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2024-8508.txt).
     
     We recommend all affected users update to `hickory-proto` 0.26.1 for the fix.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/security/advisories/GHSA-q2qq-hmj6-3wpp
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.26.1 (try `cargo update -p hickory-proto`)
   ├ hickory-proto v0.25.2
     └── hickory-resolver v0.25.2
         └── reqwest v0.13.2
             └── libdd-common v5.0.0

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:127:1
    │
127 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      └── libdd-common v5.0.0

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:148:1
    │
148 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2
      │   │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │       └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:148:1
    │
148 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2
      │   │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │       └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:148:1
    │
148 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2
      │   │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │       └── reqwest v0.13.2 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-remote-config - 5 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:94:1
   │
94 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to c...*[Comment body truncated]*

// TODO: We do not store the delegated targets metadata
// This will need to be revisited in order to support proper Uptane
// verification of the full configuration data.
// store(repo, &targets_path, &metas.delegated_targets).await?;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can safely skip them, director repo already confirms it's from datadog, for your account, integrity checks and the routing predicate. What it does not confirm is the product behind the config

@paullegranddc paullegranddc changed the title feat: agentless RC fetcher feat(remote-config)!: agentless RC fetcher Jun 22, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the sidecar label Jun 23, 2026
@paullegranddc paullegranddc marked this pull request as ready for review June 23, 2026 14:13
@paullegranddc paullegranddc requested review from a team as code owners June 23, 2026 14:13
@paullegranddc paullegranddc requested review from a team as code owners June 23, 2026 14:13

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f71677404b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

.uri(url_with_path(self.endpoint.url.clone(), path)?)
.method(method)
.body(body)?;
Ok(self.http.request(req).await?)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Honor endpoint timeouts for agentless requests

When agentless mode is pointed at a slow or unresponsive RC backend, this await is not bounded by Endpoint::timeout_ms. The agent path wraps its HTTP request in tokio::time::timeout(...), and NativeHttpClient only awaits hyper and body collection, so a stalled request can keep fetch_once and the SharedFetcher run loop stuck indefinitely instead of allowing cancellation or later polls. Wrap this request with the endpoint timeout before awaiting it.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

self.config_client.update().await?;
self.director_client.update().await?;

let targets: Vec<TrustedTarget<'_>> = trusted_targets(&self.director_client)?.collect();

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Require config-repo validation before caching targets

When the backend returns delegated config targets, this code discards config_metas.delegated_targets and then builds the active target set exclusively from the director repository. In a buggy or compromised online director/backend scenario, a target whose path/hash is valid in director metadata but missing or different in the config repository is still fetched and cached, so the offline config repository no longer authorizes the bytes. Store/refresh delegated config metadata and verify each director target against the config repo before returning it.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f71677404b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

.uri(url_with_path(self.endpoint.url.clone(), path)?)
.method(method)
.body(body)?;
Ok(self.http.request(req).await?)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Honor endpoint timeouts for agentless requests

When agentless mode is pointed at a slow or unresponsive RC backend, this await is not bounded by Endpoint::timeout_ms. The agent path wraps its HTTP request in tokio::time::timeout(...), and NativeHttpClient only awaits hyper and body collection, so a stalled request can keep fetch_once and the SharedFetcher run loop stuck indefinitely instead of allowing cancellation or later polls. Wrap this request with the endpoint timeout before awaiting it.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

self.config_client.update().await?;
self.director_client.update().await?;

let targets: Vec<TrustedTarget<'_>> = trusted_targets(&self.director_client)?.collect();

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Require config-repo validation before caching targets

When the backend returns delegated config targets, this code discards config_metas.delegated_targets and then builds the active target set exclusively from the director repository. In a buggy or compromised online director/backend scenario, a target whose path/hash is valid in director metadata but missing or different in the config repository is still fetched and cached, so the offline config repository no longer authorizes the bytes. Store/refresh delegated config metadata and verify each director target against the config repo before returning it.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants