Skip to content

Update codeowners file - #12228

Draft
sarahchen6 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
sarahchen6/update-codeowners
Draft

Update codeowners file#12228
sarahchen6 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
sarahchen6/update-codeowners

Conversation

@sarahchen6

@sarahchen6 sarahchen6 commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

Update CODEOWNERS file such that

  • Shared tooling and modules are explicitly owned by @DataDog/apm-java - there is no longer a default team
  • A few product paths are updated to include all tests under their domain

Motivation

RFC for "CODEOWNER File Expectations Across dd-trace-* Repositories": https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sRETEtnOf-ewrfuf_eQCs1nL8wbht2N7Dm9m5nrMJ1Y/edit?usp=sharing

Ensure that all code is properly and explicitly owned and protected by teams with the most context in that domain.

Additional Notes

In conjunction with these changes, all-files-are-owned via Datadog’s MergeGate mechanism should be enabled - this ensures that all new and existing files have assigned codeowners, according to the Code Ownership Service

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

@sarahchen6 sarahchen6 added type: feature Enhancements and improvements tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes comp: tooling Build & Tooling labels Aug 17, 2026
@sarahchen6
sarahchen6 force-pushed the sarahchen6/update-codeowners branch from d9a19bb to 6b37d5d Compare August 17, 2026 20:46
@datadog-prod-us1-4

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 58.30% (-0.06%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 6b37d5d | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 14.82 s 14.71 s [-0.2%; +1.8%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 13.64 s 13.75 s [-1.7%; +0.2%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 17.44 s 17.37 s [-0.6%; +1.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 17.27 s 17.53 s [-2.3%; -0.6%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 17.41 s 16.77 s [-0.8%; +8.5%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 16.72 s 17.26 s [-7.3%; +1.0%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.58 s 16.71 s [-1.8%; +0.2%] (no difference)

Commit: 6b37d5d9 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

comp: tooling Build & Tooling tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes type: feature Enhancements and improvements

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant