Openuniverse tutorial updates ahead of Sep 15 webinar - #370
Open
jkrick wants to merge 9 commits into
Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…tebook Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
troyraen
requested review from
bsipocz and
jaladh-singhal
and removed request for
troyraen
August 17, 2026 21:53
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates the OpenUniverse2024 tutorials to the full data release and reconciles how they find data.
Closes #309.
What changed
a reader has no reason to know an earlier subset existed.
24-value block grid while asking SIA for Rubin. Both now go through SIA, removing the grid constants,
block_wcs(),find_block(),get_roman_coadd_fpath(), and the grid-vs-header verification.exposure sits ~170° from north, the Rubin visit ~160°), so the four figures in §2/§3/§4/§6 were
previously all at different orientations. Each is now resampled onto a north-up grid keeping its own
pixel scale, so Roman's finer sampling stays visible. Whole exposures resample at coarser sampling for
display. Rotation leaves empty corners, so
stretch_color()is nan-aware. This is whatreprojectisfor now; the old
reproject_to_TAN()is gone.playback controls and visit-coverage guidance.
OpenUniverse2024group listed first, Quickstart at thetop, prefix-free titles,
simulated.mdsplit into two galleries.docstrings. Three cells were split first, since a cell folds as a unit.
Why no coadds
Neither survey's coadds are reachable through SIA for the full release.
not on a timeline that affects this PR.
The notebooks use single exposures throughout and don't mention coadds, so nothing needs rewriting when the
Roman coadds are registered. Consequence for visualization notebook: every full-release Rubin product is a single visit, so the Rubin panel is genuinely shallow
CI cost
The firefly notebook was measured end-to-end, not estimated:
Firefly: known issues, left for a separate PR
Firefly behaves inconsistently here. On some runs §5 and §7 work exactly as written — the Rubin image
displays and the region overlays appear — and on others the image does not display at all, on the same code
and inputs. I can't figure this out. This PR does not try to fix it. @jaladh-singhal please review sections 5 & 7 especially carefully, or open a new PR for any necessary changes.
firefly_client3.4.0 also deprecated two things the notebook uses, so §5 and §7 print:Notes for reviewers