diff --git a/apps/sim/content/library/top-ai-assistants-2026/index.mdx b/apps/sim/content/library/top-ai-assistants-2026/index.mdx
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0a2a43f5673
--- /dev/null
+++ b/apps/sim/content/library/top-ai-assistants-2026/index.mdx
@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+---
+slug: top-ai-assistants-2026
+title: 'Top AI Assistants in 2026'
+description: 'Compare the top AI assistants in 2026 for personal productivity, research, writing, Microsoft 365, and autonomous work, including features, pricing, privacy, and tradeoffs.'
+date: 2026-09-10
+updated: 2026-09-10
+authors:
+  - andrew
+readingTime: 11
+tags: [AI Assistants, AI Agents, Productivity, Sim]
+ogImage: /library/top-ai-assistants-2026/cover.jpg
+canonical: https://www.sim.ai/library/top-ai-assistants-2026
+draft: false
+faq:
+  - q: "What is the difference between an AI chat app and a personal AI assistant?"
+    a: "An AI chat app (such as ChatGPT or Claude) is primarily a reactive window: it generates text when prompted, though optional scheduled tasks and connectors can take actions in supported services, and conversation history remains hosted by the provider. A personal AI assistant (such as Vellum) lives on your computer, maintains continuous memory across devices, and proactively takes real-world actions on your behalf—such as managing calendars, triaging email, monitoring web feeds, and executing scheduled tasks. Choose a chat app for ad-hoc brainstorming and a personal assistant for ongoing operational work."
+  - q: "Which privacy features should I look for in an AI assistant?"
+    a: "If data privacy is a priority, look for three safeguards: local-first data custody, an isolated hardware credential vault, and model autonomy. Many cloud assistants retain conversation logs to train models or store sensitive API keys on shared servers. Platforms like Vellum keep your memory and credentials in a hardware-backed vault on your local machine—with none of your data accessible by the platform unless you opt in—and let you route queries through offline local models (such as Ollama) for zero data leakage."
+  - q: "Can an AI assistant execute actions on my computer safely?"
+    a: "Safe personal AI assistants use deterministic permission tiers and human-in-the-loop approval gates. While an assistant can autonomously handle low-risk background tasks (such as compiling web research or monitoring feeds), any state-changing or sensitive action—such as sending an external email, modifying files, executing terminal scripts, or initiating payments—requires your direct confirmation before execution."
+  - q: "How does continuous memory work in modern AI assistants?"
+    a: "Continuous memory allows an assistant to retain user preferences, active projects, context, and operational habits over months of work rather than resetting per thread. While conventional chat apps offer limited session memory within a single browser, advanced personal assistants unify your memory layer across Mac, mobile, web, and team chat. When you update a task on mobile or mention a preference via voice, your desktop assistant immediately carries that context into its next background run."
+  - q: "Can an AI assistant run on my local machine and work offline?"
+    a: "Yes, provided the platform supports local open-source model runtimes. While mainstream services like ChatGPT, Claude, and Microsoft Copilot require permanent connections to proprietary cloud servers, open-source personal assistants like Vellum support local model engines like Ollama. This architecture allows you to run private inference, document analysis, and script automations entirely offline on your local hardware without transmitting sensitive data over the internet."
+  - q: "Is a free AI assistant good enough for personal and work use?"
+    a: "A free tier is generally sufficient for occasional writing, web search, summarization, and brainstorming. However, free plans for conversational apps typically restrict context windows, rate-limit access to top-tier reasoning models, and lack background execution. If you rely on an assistant to manage day-to-day operations, coordinate calendars, and run continuous workflows, start with a free plan to evaluate the workflow fit, then upgrade compute and storage as daily task volume expands."
+---
+
+## TL;DR
+
+- **Vellum | Best overall personal AI assistant.** An [open-source personal AI assistant](https://www.vellum.ai/docs/hosting-options/local-hosting) that can live on your computer, remember across conversations, take actions across connected tools, and keep data local.
+- **ChatGPT | Best for general-purpose use.** Its [multimodal tools and broad feature set](https://openai.com/chatgpt/pricing/) support a wide range of everyday conversational tasks.
+- **Claude | Best for writing and long documents.** Its [large context windows](https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/context-windows) suit extended context, complex policy analysis, and nuanced prose.
+- **Perplexity | Best for research.** It combines [web search with cited answers](https://www.perplexity.ai/help-center/en/articles/10352155-what-is-perplexity) for quick verification.
+- **Microsoft Copilot | Best for Microsoft 365 users.** It works inside [documents, spreadsheets, email, and meeting tools](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-copilot/pricing-new).
+- **Lindy | Best for lightweight autonomous actions.** Its [integrations and routines](https://docs.lindy.ai/teammate/routines) handle administrative tasks like calendar coordination and inbox triage.
+
+Use the detailed entries to compare each assistant's capabilities, pricing, and tradeoffs.
+
+## Why AI assistants matter more in 2026 and how we evaluated them
+
+The right AI assistant depends on the job it performs. While early tools operated primarily as disposable chat boxes in a browser tab, the category in 2026 divides into two distinct experiences: reactive chat windows that generate text on command, and autonomous personal assistants that can run locally, retain continuous memory, and execute actions across everyday work tools. This guide evaluates both approaches across their primary strengths rather than treating them as interchangeable. For a deeper explanation of the distinction, read [AI agents vs. chatbots](https://www.sim.ai/library/ai-agent-vs-chatbot).
+
+This list covers assistants built primarily for individual users, operators, and developers. Some entries can execute system actions or background routines, while others focus on direct conversational interaction. Heavy workflow automation platforms fall outside our scope because they focus on connecting backend APIs rather than serving as a continuous personal assistant. Teams comparing those systems can instead review the [best AI automation tools in 2026](https://www.sim.ai/library/best-ai-automation-tools-2026).
+
+We evaluated each assistant across model flexibility, integration depth, privacy controls, continuous memory, multimodal capabilities, and pricing transparency. Each ranking also accounts for concrete tradeoffs, such as closed ecosystems, cloud data retention, or machine connectivity requirements. Rankings reflect each product's fit for its target use case rather than a single aggregate score.
+
+## What to look for in a personal AI assistant
+
+- **Model quality and access.** Check which models the assistant offers and whether you can select or switch models per task. The best platforms let you route strategy to frontier reasoning models while using fast or local models for routine data processing.
+- **Integration breadth.** Choose an assistant that connects directly to the tools where you already work. Useful integrations include email, calendars, local files, messaging clients, and code repositories.
+- **Privacy and data handling.** Review whether the provider stores prompts, uses conversation logs for model training, or isolates credentials. Users handling personal or business data should prioritize local storage and hardware credential vaults.
+- **Multimodal capability.** Confirm which formats the assistant can process and produce. Image interpretation, voice conversation, document parsing, and screen analysis can significantly reduce manual context entry.
+- **Pricing transparency.** Compare monthly base fees alongside compute limits, model access restrictions, and extra charges. A clear tier structure provides better long-term predictability than opaque credit burn rates.
+
+## Vellum
+
+**Best for**
+
+People who want an autonomous personal AI assistant that lives on their computer, takes real actions across work tools, and keeps data private.
+
+**What it is**
+
+Vellum is an open-source personal AI assistant that can [run locally on a Mac](https://www.vellum.ai/docs/hosting-options/local-hosting). Unlike traditional chat interfaces that wait passively in a browser tab, Vellum can work proactively in the background: managing calendars, triaging email, monitoring web feeds, executing scheduled tasks, and building lightweight internal tools.
+
+Vellum has [persistent memory](https://www.vellum.ai/docs/key-concepts/memory-and-context) that carries useful context across interactions. It also offers companion access through multiple messaging and client surfaces. When locally hosted, data stays on the machine, while [OS-level sandboxing and a keychain-backed credential vault](https://www.vellum.ai/docs/developer-guide/security) protect tools and credentials.
+
+Vellum supports [managed cloud model access](https://www.vellum.ai/docs/hosting-options/cloud-hosting), while its hosting options give users flexibility between a hosted assistant and a locally run assistant.
+
+**Pros**
+
+- Can live directly on your machine with persistent memory.
+- [Background tools and integrations](https://www.vellum.ai/docs/developer-guide/features) support scheduled checks, calendar preparation, inbox cleanup, and custom skills.
+- Local hosting offers direct control over data, with credentials stored in a keychain-backed vault.
+- Model flexibility reduces dependence on a single provider.
+- The open-source codebase allows inspection of security, agent logic, and data handling.
+
+**Cons**
+
+- Advanced local actions, such as host file manipulation or terminal scripts, require your computer to remain active and connected.
+- It is not designed as a disposable web-search widget; it is engineered for users wanting a persistent operational assistant.
+
+**Pricing**
+
+Vellum is free to start, including a small hosted machine. Its [current pricing](https://www.vellum.ai/pricing) lists Mighty at $30/month, Super at $100/month, and Ultra at $200/month, with different compute, storage, and included-credit allocations. Self-hosting has no Vellum platform fee.
+
+## ChatGPT
+
+**Best for**
+
+People who want one general-purpose assistant for everyday writing, research, coding, file analysis, image work, and voice conversations.
+
+**What it is**
+
+ChatGPT is OpenAI's general-purpose AI assistant. Its [plans support combinations of text, file uploads, image creation, research, voice, and other tools](https://openai.com/chatgpt/pricing/), with availability and limits varying by plan. GPTs can adapt ChatGPT for specialized tasks, although [creation and publishing availability depends on account type](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8554397-creating-a-custom-gpt).
+
+ChatGPT is centered on conversational interaction, but some plans also include scheduled tasks and connections to external services. Available models, tools, usage limits, and data controls vary by plan, and conversations are processed in OpenAI's cloud environment. Individual users can [turn off the setting that allows conversations to improve OpenAI's models](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7730893-data-usage-for-chatgpt).
+
+**Pros**
+
+- Covers a wide range of everyday multimodal tasks.
+- Voice features and [image creation and editing](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/11084440) support interactive exploration.
+- GPTs and connected tools support specialized use cases.
+- A large user community makes tutorials and prompt troubleshooting easy to find.
+
+**Cons**
+
+- Most work begins in a cloud conversation rather than through unrestricted local system control.
+- The product is tied to OpenAI's model families.
+- Users must review data controls and opt out if they do not want eligible conversations used to improve models.
+
+**Pricing**
+
+OpenAI offers free and paid plans. [ChatGPT Plus costs $20/month](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6950777-what-is-chatgpt-plus), while business and enterprise options add higher limits and administrative features.
+
+## Claude
+
+**Best for**
+
+Knowledge workers requiring long-document analysis, complex reasoning, and nuanced writing.
+
+**What it is**
+
+Claude is Anthropic's general-purpose AI assistant. It is well suited to analyzing lengthy documents, comparing source materials, writing polished prose, interpreting images, and working with complex codebases. Anthropic documents [large context windows for Claude models](https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models/overview), which suit tasks that require synthesizing information across extensive reports or books.
+
+Claude often provides measured answers with thoughtful caveats, making it useful for research synthesis and sensitive editorial tasks. It is no longer limited to an isolated web application: [connectors can retrieve data and take actions in connected services](https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/11176164-pre-built-web-connectors-using-remote-mcp), although it does not provide unrestricted local computer control by default.
+
+**Pros**
+
+- Strong comprehension across long documents, technical filings, and codebases.
+- Articulate prose style suited to editing and drafting.
+- [Claude Projects](https://www.anthropic.com/news/projects) provide structured workspaces with reference documents.
+- Thoughtful reasoning on complex policy and analytical questions.
+
+**Cons**
+
+- Local and connected actions depend on supported connectors, extensions, and permissions.
+- Conservative safety filters can occasionally block legitimate research queries.
+- Tied to Anthropic's Claude model family.
+
+**Pricing**
+
+Claude offers a free tier with usage limits. [Claude Pro costs $20 when billed monthly](https://www.anthropic.com/pricing), with annual discounts and higher individual and organizational tiers also available.
+
+## Perplexity
+
+**Best for**
+
+Researchers who want current web information with visible source citations.
+
+**What it is**
+
+Perplexity combines an AI assistant with a search engine. It [searches the web and presents answers with citations](https://www.perplexity.ai/help-center/en/articles/10352895-how-does-perplexity-work). Follow-up queries preserve research context, helping you narrow a topic without rebuilding search terms from scratch.
+
+Perplexity is especially useful for market scans, product comparisons, and early-stage research. Its primary strength remains information retrieval, although its current product also includes deeper research and computer-based workflows.
+
+**Pros**
+
+- Searches current web content and provides links to supporting sources.
+- A conversational interface lets you refine complex questions while retaining context.
+- Paid subscriptions include [selection among advanced models](https://www.perplexity.ai/help-center/en/articles/10354919-what-advanced-ai-models-are-included-in-my-subscription).
+- Research modes can explore a question across many sources.
+
+**Cons**
+
+- Its research-first workflow is less focused on local calendar management or operating-system automation.
+- Citations can occasionally support only part of a claim, requiring manual verification.
+- It offers a different mix of productivity and creative tools than broad chat assistants.
+
+**Pricing**
+
+Perplexity offers a free plan and paid subscriptions. Its [official pricing page](https://www.perplexity.ai/hub/pricing) lists Pro at $20/month, with expanded research, model access, uploads, and usage limits.
+
+## Microsoft Copilot
+
+**Best for**
+
+Microsoft 365 users who want AI assistance embedded inside documents, email, spreadsheets, and meetings.
+
+**What it is**
+
+Microsoft 365 Copilot works across apps such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams. Depending on plan and feature availability, it can help draft documents, summarize email threads, analyze spreadsheet data, create presentations, and recap meetings. Microsoft describes the current app and plan combinations on its [Copilot pricing page](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-copilot/pricing-new).
+
+Copilot can use organizational context governed by Microsoft 365 permissions. Microsoft documents that [Copilot APIs use Microsoft Graph's authentication and authorization model](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/copilot/extensibility/copilot-apis-security-authentication). Its greatest utility is within the Microsoft ecosystem, with less flexibility for custom local scripts or non-Microsoft model choices.
+
+**Pros**
+
+- Works directly inside familiar Microsoft 365 applications.
+- Microsoft Graph context reduces manual copy-pasting between work files and the assistant.
+- Microsoft provides enterprise security, compliance, and administrative controls.
+
+**Cons**
+
+- Delivers less value if your workflow sits outside Microsoft 365.
+- Full capabilities depend on the selected Microsoft 365 and Copilot licenses.
+- Setup and administrative configuration can be complex for individuals or small teams.
+
+**Pricing**
+
+Microsoft offers multiple individual, business, and enterprise combinations, and availability varies by region and billing term. Review [Microsoft's current Copilot plans](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-copilot/pricing-new) alongside any required Microsoft 365 subscription.
+
+## Lindy
+
+**Best for**
+
+Users who want an AI personal assistant to handle recurring email, calendar, and meeting triage.
+
+**What it is**
+
+Lindy lets you create autonomous assistants that connect to work apps and take actions with limited supervision. Its [integrations include services such as Gmail, Slack, Notion, and Google Drive](https://docs.lindy.ai/integrations/overview), with controls over personal and workspace connections. You can configure recurring instructions for meeting follow-ups, daily briefs, and other routines.
+
+Lindy suits operators who want more action-taking than a standard chat window provides without building complex workflows. It is a cloud service designed around packaged app integrations rather than an extensible local assistant.
+
+**Pros**
+
+- Assistants can take actions across connected email, calendar, meeting, and productivity tools.
+- [Recurring routines](https://docs.lindy.ai/teammate/routines) reduce the work needed to configure common administrative tasks.
+- Connection scopes and workspace controls help govern access to integrated tools.
+
+**Cons**
+
+- Its cloud architecture requires trusting a third-party service with connected-account access.
+- Usage allowances vary by plan, so costs can rise with heavier use.
+- It is not designed around local operating-system execution or self-hosted models.
+
+**Pricing**
+
+Lindy offers a seven-day free trial. Its [pricing documentation](https://docs.lindy.ai/pricing) lists Plus at $49.99/month, Pro at $99.99/month, and Max at $199.99/month, with different usage and connected-inbox allowances.
+
+## How the top AI assistants compare
+
+The table summarizes product support for model access, integrations, privacy controls, multimodal inputs, and pricing clarity. The ratings reflect the capabilities described in this article rather than a controlled benchmark. ✅ indicates strong support, 🟡 indicates limited or plan-dependent support, and ❌ indicates that a criterion falls outside the product's main focus.
+
+| Rank | Name | Best for | Standout capability | Tradeoff | Models | Integrations | Privacy | Multimodal | Pricing |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 1 | Vellum | Autonomous personal work and operations | Local hosting and proactive background actions | Requires computer connection for local actions | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🟡 | ✅ |
+| 2 | ChatGPT | General-purpose personal use | Broad multimodal tools and GPTs | Cloud-centered conversational workflow | ✅ | ✅ | 🟡 | ✅ | ✅ |
+| 3 | Claude | Writing and long documents | Deep long-context comprehension | Connected actions depend on supported integrations | ✅ | 🟡 | 🟡 | ✅ | ✅ |
+| 4 | Perplexity | Web research | Current answers with citations | Less focused on local actions | ✅ | 🟡 | 🟡 | ✅ | ✅ |
+| 5 | Microsoft Copilot | Microsoft 365 users | Embedded inside Microsoft office apps | Best features depend on licenses | 🟡 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | 🟡 |
+| 6 | Lindy | Lightweight administrative tasks | Trigger-based email and calendar actions | Cloud-only and usage-tiered | 🟡 | ✅ | 🟡 | 🟡 | 🟡 |
+
+## Which AI assistant fits you
+
+- **Operators who need an assistant that takes real actions should consider Vellum.** Its local machine execution, background scheduling, and continuous memory are designed for operational workloads rather than only generating text. For more options in this category, compare the [best AI agents for executive assistant tasks](https://www.sim.ai/library/best-ai-agents-for-executive-assistant-tasks).
+- **Researchers should consider Perplexity.** Its search-first interface provides current answers with citations you can inspect.
+- **Microsoft 365 users should consider Microsoft Copilot.** It works inside tools such as Word, Outlook, and Teams, using context governed by Microsoft permissions.
+- **Users seeking lightweight administrative automations should consider Lindy.** It handles routine inbox and calendar actions without requiring a complex workflow automation builder. The [best AI agents for scheduling and calendar management](https://www.sim.ai/library/best-ai-agents-for-scheduling-and-calendar-management-in-2026) offers a broader comparison.
+- **People who want a versatile, ready-made chat app should consider ChatGPT.** It combines writing, coding, file analysis, image generation, and voice features in one service.
+- **People who work with long documents should consider Claude.** Its large context capacity and writing strengths suit in-depth report analysis, technical review, and prose editing.
+- **Teams prioritizing data sovereignty and local execution should consider Vellum.** Its open-source architecture, local credential vault, and local hosting options provide more direct control over data.
+
+## Why Vellum leads this list
+
+Vellum leads because it bridges the gap between passive conversational chat and operational execution. While traditional assistants typically begin with a prompt, Vellum can function as a persistent personal assistant that runs on your computer, remembers across sessions, and executes background routines.
+
+Its open-source foundation and local hosting option give users direct control over credentials and memory. Combined with flexible cloud and local hosting options, Vellum offers a compelling balance of autonomy, privacy, and operational capability for personal computing in 2026.
diff --git a/apps/sim/public/library/top-ai-assistants-2026/cover.jpg b/apps/sim/public/library/top-ai-assistants-2026/cover.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..86c1c564fbc
Binary files /dev/null and b/apps/sim/public/library/top-ai-assistants-2026/cover.jpg differ