Skip to content

Simpler Library Benefits DMN implementation #486

Description

@prestoncabe

Can a benefit's definition be declarative only?

  • Name
  • Description
  • Version (eventually, when we support versioning per benefit and per eligibility check)
  • List of Eligibility Checks
    • Each check:
      • Default alias for this benefit (e.g. PersonMinAge -> "Client is at least 60 years old")
      • Parameters

Need to look at the existing library benefits and test the above.

  • one possible caveat: should every check be part of the library or can the benefit itself have a "custom check" that is invisible to the rest of the library? Maybe such a check would also be importable to the builder somehow as a custom check for the given user?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    • Status
      No status

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions